+82.1%
ZETA vs GPC
0.0%
+82.0%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GPC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.7% | -0.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +26.5% | -1.3% | +27.8% | +26.6% |
| 30D | +10.3% | -6.0% | +16.3% | +10.8% |
| 3M | +30.5% | -7.6% | +38.2% | +31.4% |
| 6M | +129.4% | +24.2% | +105.1% | +119.9% |
| YTD | +83.1% | +2.7% | +80.4% | +68.2% |
| 1Y | +82.1% | +0.2% | +81.9% | +69.2% |
| All | +82.1% | 0.0% | +82.0% | +69.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GPC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GPC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GPC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GPC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling