+281.7%
ZETA vs FLUT
-52.0%
+333.6%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -1.5% | +6.8% | +5.9% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -1.1% | +0.6% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -8.0% | +7.7% | -15.7% | -11.6% |
| 3M | +21.4% | -12.2% | +33.6% | +25.8% |
| 6M | +80.1% | -17.6% | +97.7% | +89.0% |
| YTD | +52.5% | -62.0% | +114.5% | +124.6% |
| 1Y | +58.5% | -62.3% | +120.7% | +134.3% |
| 3Y | +281.7% | -52.0% | +333.6% | +441.6% |
| All | +281.7% | -52.0% | +333.6% | +441.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling