+231.4%
ZETA vs FBTC
+62.5%
+169.0%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.7% | -0.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +1.5% | -4.0% | -2.9% |
| 30D | +15.6% | +20.7% | -5.1% | +7.2% |
| 3M | +41.5% | +23.7% | +17.8% | +29.8% |
| 6M | +63.4% | +15.0% | +48.4% | +53.0% |
| YTD | +51.3% | -10.5% | +61.8% | +54.7% |
| 1Y | +65.8% | -30.3% | +96.1% | +86.1% |
| All | +231.4% | +62.5% | +169.0% | +203.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling