+306.2%
ZETA vs FBTC
+54.5%
+251.7%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | +1.3% | +6.3% | +7.1% |
| 7D | +18.8% | -6.8% | +25.5% | +22.2% |
| 30D | +12.6% | -9.9% | +22.5% | +17.5% |
| 3M | +29.5% | +17.5% | +12.0% | +21.3% |
| 6M | +128.6% | -9.1% | +137.7% | +135.3% |
| YTD | +85.5% | -14.9% | +100.3% | +93.3% |
| 1Y | +90.6% | -27.6% | +118.2% | +111.1% |
| All | +306.2% | +54.5% | +251.7% | +278.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling