+98.0%
ZETA vs ENTG
+78.6%
+19.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -3.8% | +2.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +18.1% | +15.2% | +2.9% | +16.3% |
| 30D | +13.6% | -3.6% | +17.2% | +13.5% |
| 3M | +23.7% | -10.0% | +33.7% | +24.6% |
| 6M | +128.5% | +1.8% | +126.7% | +121.1% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +75.5% | +4.6% | +30.8% |
| 1Y | +98.0% | +82.4% | +15.6% | +40.8% |
| All | +98.0% | +78.6% | +19.4% | +40.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling