+90.3%
ZETA vs ENTG
+63.3%
+27.0%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -6.5% | +9.1% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -10.3% | +5.3% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -14.4% | +11.0% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -1.1% | +32.1% | +30.7% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +3.0% | +69.2% | +64.1% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +70.1% | -13.9% | +6.9% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +65.7% | +24.6% | +33.0% |
| All | +90.3% | +63.3% | +27.0% | +33.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling