+279.2%
ZETA vs EAT
+612.9%
-333.7%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -3.4% | +1.6% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -4.9% | +2.5% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +15.6% | -1.2% | +16.8% | +15.3% |
| 3M | +41.5% | +52.2% | -10.7% | +24.9% |
| 6M | +63.4% | +65.0% | -1.6% | +38.9% |
| YTD | +51.3% | +55.0% | -3.7% | +30.9% |
| 1Y | +65.8% | +42.1% | +23.7% | +46.7% |
| 3Y | +279.2% | +614.7% | -335.5% | +151.7% |
| All | +279.2% | +612.9% | -333.7% | +151.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling