+90.3%
ZETA vs EAT
+109.8%
-19.5%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +6.3% | -3.7% | +2.2% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.1% | -4.9% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +13.5% | -16.9% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +31.0% | +1.0% | +30.0% | +30.8% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +57.3% | +14.9% | +62.6% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +53.6% | +2.6% | +52.1% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +110.8% | -20.5% | +94.6% |
| All | +90.3% | +109.8% | -19.5% | +94.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling