+273.7%
ZETA vs DINO
+98.1%
+175.6%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.2% | -1.0% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +2.0% | -2.0% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +10.5% | +27.7% | -17.2% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +44.3% | +56.3% | -12.0% | +28.1% |
| 6M | +59.4% | +107.6% | -48.1% | +30.1% |
| YTD | +49.5% | +140.2% | -90.7% | +15.2% |
| 1Y | +62.7% | +113.0% | -50.3% | +30.0% |
| All | +273.7% | +98.1% | +175.6% | +153.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling