+278.3%
ZETA vs BIIB
-18.3%
+296.6%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -3.8% | +2.0% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -1.6% | -0.8% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +15.6% | +2.2% | +13.4% | +15.1% |
| 3M | +41.5% | +10.3% | +31.2% | +37.9% |
| 6M | +63.4% | +14.9% | +48.5% | +56.6% |
| YTD | +51.3% | +20.7% | +30.6% | +42.0% |
| 1Y | +65.8% | +50.3% | +15.5% | +46.3% |
| All | +278.3% | -18.3% | +296.6% | +303.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling