+348.6%
ZETA vs ARWR
+79.8%
+268.8%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +1.3% | -3.0% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +18.1% | -17.8% | +36.0% | +21.7% |
| 30D | +13.6% | -18.1% | +31.7% | +17.2% |
| 3M | +23.7% | -44.2% | +67.9% | +35.7% |
| 6M | +128.5% | -38.6% | +167.1% | +143.7% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -28.0% | +108.1% | +84.6% |
| 1Y | +98.0% | +16.1% | +81.9% | +82.4% |
| 3Y | +348.6% | +84.0% | +264.6% | +239.0% |
| All | +348.6% | +79.8% | +268.8% | +239.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling