+90.6%
ZETA vs AMDL
+168.6%
-77.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMDL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | +14.3% | -6.7% | +6.7% |
| 7D | +18.8% | +18.5% | +0.2% | +16.6% |
| 30D | +12.6% | -24.2% | +36.9% | +12.3% |
| 3M | +29.5% | +11.5% | +18.0% | +27.4% |
| 6M | +128.6% | -1.0% | +129.6% | +118.7% |
| YTD | +85.5% | +260.3% | -174.8% | +39.0% |
| 1Y | +90.6% | +178.2% | -87.5% | +50.0% |
| All | +90.6% | +168.6% | -77.9% | +50.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMDL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMDL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMDL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMDL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling