+291.9%
ZETA vs AMC
-79.6%
+371.5%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +4.3% | -8.4% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +2.3% | +0.3% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -0.7% | +16.6% | +15.7% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +35.2% | +0.2% | +28.8% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +124.6% | -57.5% | +50.4% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +69.9% | -15.8% | +41.8% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -2.6% | +70.4% | +61.0% |
| All | +291.9% | -79.6% | +371.5% | +283.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling