+291.9%
ZETA vs AMBA
-1.0%
+292.8%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMBA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.8% | -3.3% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -11.0% | +13.6% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -23.2% | +39.0% | +23.7% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -12.7% | +48.1% | +35.2% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +11.2% | +55.9% | +46.8% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -11.2% | +65.3% | +46.0% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -22.5% | +90.4% | +65.2% |
| All | +291.9% | -1.0% | +292.8% | +245.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMBA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMBA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMBA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMBA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling