+76.3%
ZETA vs ACGL
+22.9%
+53.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.2% | +0.9% | +7.2% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +13.2% | +1.3% | +12.0% | +13.4% |
| 30D | +6.0% | +14.2% | -8.2% | +7.7% |
| 3M | +27.3% | +11.1% | +16.3% | +29.2% |
| 6M | +104.6% | +16.4% | +88.3% | +112.0% |
| YTD | +72.3% | +13.8% | +58.6% | +73.6% |
| 1Y | +76.3% | +21.6% | +54.8% | +74.4% |
| All | +76.3% | +22.9% | +53.4% | +74.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling