-100.0%
ZCMD vs PTEN
-3.7%
-96.3%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PTEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.1% | -0.4% | -6.7% | -7.0% |
| 7D | -5.4% | +3.5% | -8.9% | -6.2% |
| 30D | -24.8% | +17.5% | -42.3% | -27.3% |
| 3M | -62.8% | +12.7% | -75.5% | -63.5% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +33.1% | -132.6% | -99.6% |
| YTD | -99.8% | +116.4% | -216.2% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +141.2% | -241.1% | -99.9% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | -3.8% | -96.2% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | -3.7% | -96.3% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PTEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PTEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PTEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PTEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling