-100.0%
ZCMD vs FIVE
+59.0%
-159.0%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIVE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.7% | -1.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +3.7% | -5.1% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -21.6% | +4.0% | -25.5% | -21.0% |
| 3M | -67.4% | +36.2% | -103.6% | -65.9% |
| 6M | -99.4% | +18.0% | -117.5% | -99.4% |
| YTD | -99.7% | +34.9% | -134.6% | -99.7% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +67.9% | -167.8% | -99.9% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | +57.3% | -157.3% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | +59.0% | -159.0% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIVE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIVE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIVE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIVE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling