-100.0%
ZCMD vs FGI
-70.6%
-29.4%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -0.8% | +2.6% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -7.0% | +2.5% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -43.0% | -4.2% | -38.8% | -43.0% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +55.6% | -110.5% | -53.9% |
| 6M | -99.8% | -3.2% | -96.6% | -99.8% |
| YTD | -99.9% | +29.1% | -129.0% | -99.9% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +51.0% | -150.9% | -99.9% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | +1.5% | -101.5% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | -70.6% | -29.4% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling