-99.9%
ZCMD vs CLBK
+68.0%
-167.9%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.1% | -0.1% | -7.0% | -7.1% |
| 7D | -5.4% | -1.5% | -4.0% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -24.8% | -1.0% | -23.8% | -25.0% |
| 3M | -62.8% | +22.9% | -85.7% | -63.4% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +44.2% | -143.7% | -99.6% |
| YTD | -99.8% | +64.0% | -163.7% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +65.7% | -165.6% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | +68.0% | -167.9% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling