-100.0%
ZCMD vs AMBA
-1.0%
-99.0%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMBA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.7% | -0.8% | -3.0% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -8.0% | -11.0% | +3.0% | -6.8% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -23.2% | -4.7% | -25.9% |
| 3M | -74.6% | -12.7% | -61.9% | -74.5% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +11.2% | -110.7% | -99.4% |
| YTD | -99.7% | -11.2% | -88.5% | -99.7% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | -22.5% | -77.3% | -99.9% |
| All | -100.0% | -1.0% | -99.0% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMBA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMBA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMBA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMBA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling