+37.5%
ZBRA vs EPAM
-56.4%
+93.9%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -1.5% | -1.3% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -0.9% | +3.5% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -6.4% | +18.4% | -24.7% | -11.6% |
| 3M | +51.3% | +19.2% | +32.1% | +41.3% |
| 6M | +60.5% | -21.0% | +81.5% | +71.7% |
| YTD | +45.2% | -43.7% | +88.9% | +73.6% |
| 1Y | +12.3% | -29.9% | +42.2% | +22.0% |
| 3Y | +37.5% | -56.5% | +94.1% | +65.0% |
| All | +37.5% | -56.4% | +93.9% | +65.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling