+35.3%
ZBRA vs BLDR
-56.4%
+91.7%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -1.9% | -0.3% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -2.7% | +0.9% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -8.8% | -14.7% | +5.9% | -3.9% |
| 3M | +47.2% | -20.8% | +68.1% | +57.9% |
| 6M | +61.3% | -35.3% | +96.6% | +84.7% |
| YTD | +42.0% | -40.3% | +82.3% | +65.9% |
| 1Y | +10.5% | -56.3% | +66.8% | +44.7% |
| All | +35.3% | -56.4% | +91.7% | +66.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling