+12.6%
ZBRA vs ACM
-48.0%
+60.6%
-38.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -3.1% | +0.9% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -3.7% | +1.9% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -8.8% | -12.7% | +3.9% | -7.3% |
| 3M | +47.2% | -9.8% | +57.0% | +49.3% |
| 6M | +61.3% | -31.4% | +92.7% | +66.8% |
| YTD | +42.0% | -32.1% | +74.1% | +45.4% |
| All | +12.6% | -48.0% | +60.6% | +23.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling