-34.0%
Z vs ABCL
+104.5%
-138.4%
-67.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -1.2% | -0.9% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -3.0% | +0.7% | -3.7% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -4.2% | +93.1% | -97.3% | -15.2% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +79.4% | -83.1% | -14.6% |
| 6M | -24.5% | +214.9% | -239.4% | -40.6% |
| YTD | -49.3% | +234.2% | -283.5% | -61.0% |
| 1Y | -58.7% | +174.8% | -233.4% | -67.8% |
| All | -34.0% | +104.5% | -138.4% | -53.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling