+40.9%
XYZ vs NIO
-64.6%
+105.5%
-53.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.6% | +0.8% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -13.0% | +12.1% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -18.3% | +16.6% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -33.2% | +50.0% | +23.1% |
| 6M | +26.9% | -21.5% | +48.3% | +29.8% |
| YTD | +27.1% | -25.5% | +52.6% | +30.6% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | -38.0% | +47.3% | +14.8% |
| All | +40.9% | -64.6% | +105.5% | +58.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling