+26.9%
XYZ vs NCLH
-27.2%
+54.1%
-16.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.1% | -0.6% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -6.5% | +5.5% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -23.3% | +21.6% | +8.6% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -18.6% | +35.4% | +25.5% |
| 6M | +26.9% | -26.2% | +53.1% | +41.0% |
| All | +26.9% | -27.2% | +54.1% | +41.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling