+55.1%
XOP vs UMAC
+508.0%
-452.9%
-35.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -6.4% | +7.0% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +1.0% | +3.3% | -2.3% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +10.8% | -10.4% | +21.2% | +10.9% |
| 3M | +19.5% | +1.8% | +17.7% | +18.9% |
| 6M | +21.6% | +40.7% | -19.2% | +19.1% |
| YTD | +55.8% | +90.9% | -35.1% | +50.9% |
| 1Y | +54.6% | +151.8% | -97.1% | +48.1% |
| All | +55.1% | +508.0% | -452.9% | +43.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling