+60.5%
XOM vs CLBK
+52.2%
+8.2%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.1% | +0.5% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -1.5% | +5.5% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -1.0% | +5.6% | +4.7% |
| 3M | +14.0% | +22.9% | -9.0% | +11.3% |
| 6M | +11.0% | +44.2% | -33.2% | +6.1% |
| YTD | +40.7% | +64.0% | -23.3% | +31.8% |
| 1Y | +52.3% | +65.7% | -13.4% | +42.2% |
| 3Y | +60.5% | +54.1% | +6.4% | +50.1% |
| All | +60.5% | +52.2% | +8.2% | +50.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling