+72.9%
XOM vs ACGL
+31.5%
+41.4%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -3.0% | +3.3% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -11.4% | +0.9% | -12.3% | -11.6% |
| 30D | +1.1% | +13.7% | -12.6% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +7.8% | +8.0% | -0.2% | +6.1% |
| 6M | +13.0% | +13.3% | -0.2% | +10.1% |
| YTD | +40.6% | +11.8% | +28.8% | +36.9% |
| 1Y | +49.1% | +22.2% | +26.8% | +42.1% |
| 3Y | +72.9% | +32.5% | +40.4% | +67.7% |
| All | +72.9% | +31.5% | +41.4% | +67.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling