+31.0%
XLV vs NIO
-65.5%
+96.5%
-17.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -3.2% | +2.7% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -7.3% | +2.9% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -22.5% | +21.1% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +8.9% | -30.9% | +39.7% | +9.9% |
| 6M | +9.1% | -37.2% | +46.3% | +10.3% |
| YTD | +7.9% | -29.8% | +37.7% | +8.7% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | -37.4% | +60.1% | +23.8% |
| All | +31.0% | -65.5% | +96.5% | +32.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling