+10.1%
XLV vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+109.3%
-16.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -3.8% | +3.6% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.6% | +17.0% | -20.6% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -61.8% | +60.0% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -54.6% | +62.4% | +7.4% |
| 6M | +9.1% | -59.3% | +68.4% | +8.9% |
| YTD | +7.7% | -74.6% | +82.3% | +7.4% |
| 1Y | +20.4% | -18.8% | +39.2% | +21.9% |
| All | +10.1% | -99.1% | +109.3% | +6.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling