+41.7%
XLP vs ALHC
-28.9%
+70.6%
-16.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -0.6% | -0.4% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -1.0% | +0.1% | -0.9% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -10.2% | +14.0% | +3.7% |
| 6M | -1.7% | -28.3% | +26.5% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +10.3% | -31.4% | +41.7% | +10.7% |
| 1Y | +7.8% | -16.9% | +24.7% | +7.6% |
| 3Y | +27.2% | +135.5% | -108.3% | +21.1% |
| 5Y | +32.5% | -33.6% | +66.2% | +26.9% |
| All | +41.7% | -28.9% | +70.6% | +35.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling