+120.4%
XLK vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+220.4%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -7.1% | +8.4% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -5.4% | +5.6% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -0.6% | -24.8% | +24.2% | -0.6% |
| 3M | +2.6% | -62.8% | +65.3% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +34.0% | -99.5% | +133.5% | +31.3% |
| YTD | +30.7% | -99.8% | +130.4% | +27.9% |
| 1Y | +39.2% | -99.9% | +139.1% | +35.7% |
| 3Y | +120.4% | -100.0% | +220.4% | +117.1% |
| All | +120.4% | -100.0% | +220.4% | +117.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling