+99.1%
XLK vs TMF
-28.1%
+127.2%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.2% | +0.1% | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -3.4% | +2.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -11.2% | +11.5% | -22.7% | -11.5% |
| 3M | -6.2% | -4.5% | -1.7% | -6.0% |
| 6M | -1.7% | -15.0% | +13.2% | -1.3% |
| YTD | +21.5% | -19.9% | +41.4% | +22.2% |
| 1Y | +19.6% | -26.6% | +46.2% | +20.3% |
| All | +99.1% | -28.1% | +127.2% | +95.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling