+120.4%
XLK vs SPYG
+98.4%
+22.0%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPYG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -0.9% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -0.6% | -1.5% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| 3M | +2.6% | +3.7% | -1.2% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +34.0% | +16.4% | +17.5% | +12.8% |
| YTD | +30.7% | +13.3% | +17.3% | +13.7% |
| 1Y | +39.2% | +17.9% | +21.3% | +15.9% |
| 3Y | +120.4% | +98.3% | +22.1% | +1.4% |
| All | +120.4% | +98.4% | +22.0% | +1.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPYG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPYG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPYG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPYG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling