+58.6%
XLK vs PLTU
+142.1%
-83.6%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -4.7% | +5.0% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -11.6% | +13.9% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -4.6% | +4.6% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +2.1% | +33.7% | -31.6% | -4.0% |
| 6M | +37.2% | -9.4% | +46.6% | +33.1% |
| YTD | +30.8% | -34.7% | +65.5% | +30.7% |
| 1Y | +42.6% | -23.2% | +65.9% | +37.1% |
| All | +58.6% | +142.1% | -83.6% | +17.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling