+120.4%
XLK vs NTNX
+82.3%
+38.1%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -3.1% | +3.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -0.6% | +2.0% | -2.6% | -1.1% |
| 3M | +2.6% | +34.0% | -31.4% | -4.2% |
| 6M | +34.0% | +72.4% | -38.4% | +16.9% |
| YTD | +30.7% | +27.5% | +3.1% | +22.3% |
| 1Y | +39.2% | -18.7% | +57.9% | +46.2% |
| 3Y | +120.4% | +80.8% | +39.7% | +75.7% |
| All | +120.4% | +82.3% | +38.1% | +75.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling