+19.4%
XLK vs NIO
-55.0%
+74.4%
-19.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -4.9% | +2.9% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -14.5% | +17.8% | +6.0% |
| 30D | -10.6% | -15.0% | +4.4% | -8.2% |
| 3M | -10.6% | -35.6% | +24.9% | -4.7% |
| 6M | -3.5% | -55.7% | +52.2% | +7.9% |
| YTD | +18.7% | -43.1% | +61.8% | +28.1% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | -53.5% | +73.0% | +33.1% |
| All | +19.4% | -55.0% | +74.4% | +33.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling