+103.5%
XLK vs HTZ
-95.4%
+198.9%
-33.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -8.4% | +9.8% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -8.2% | -14.6% | +6.4% | -7.2% |
| 30D | -18.2% | -20.8% | +2.6% | -16.9% |
| 3M | -11.0% | -18.8% | +7.8% | -10.3% |
| 6M | -2.9% | -74.7% | +71.8% | +5.5% |
| YTD | +14.8% | -68.1% | +82.9% | +21.4% |
| 1Y | +14.5% | -73.5% | +88.0% | +22.7% |
| 3Y | +94.2% | -81.8% | +176.0% | +108.4% |
| All | +103.5% | -95.4% | +198.9% | +163.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling