+155.7%
XLK vs FGI
-70.4%
+226.0%
-28.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +7.5% | -6.8% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +0.9% | +0.5% | +0.3% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +65.4% | -64.7% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -2.9% | +23.5% | -26.4% | -4.1% |
| 6M | +34.3% | +60.5% | -26.3% | +30.9% |
| YTD | +30.4% | +30.0% | +0.4% | +27.6% |
| 1Y | +43.4% | +82.1% | -38.7% | +38.2% |
| 3Y | +116.8% | -4.4% | +121.2% | +111.2% |
| All | +155.7% | -70.4% | +226.0% | +157.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling