+32.9%
XLK vs FCUV
-69.3%
+102.2%
-15.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FCUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.5% | -1.9% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -72.0% | +71.6% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -8.0% | +7.5% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +5.0% | +66.3% | -61.3% | +6.7% |
| 6M | +32.9% | -75.3% | +108.1% | +34.0% |
| All | +32.9% | -69.3% | +102.2% | +34.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling