+117.5%
XLK vs CFG
+183.3%
-65.7%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.4% | -1.8% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -1.7% | +1.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -4.6% | +4.1% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +5.0% | +7.9% | -2.9% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +32.9% | +19.9% | +13.0% | +24.9% |
| YTD | +29.0% | +21.7% | +7.3% | +20.4% |
| 1Y | +37.8% | +38.4% | -0.6% | +23.2% |
| All | +117.5% | +183.3% | -65.7% | +64.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling