+88.9%
XLK vs BTSG
+389.4%
-300.5%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.5% | -0.1% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -3.3% | +3.5% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -0.6% | -1.6% | +1.0% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +2.6% | -6.9% | +9.5% | +3.3% |
| 6M | +34.0% | +42.1% | -8.1% | +23.8% |
| YTD | +30.7% | +56.8% | -26.2% | +18.5% |
| 1Y | +39.2% | +109.8% | -70.6% | +19.6% |
| All | +88.9% | +389.4% | -300.5% | +41.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling