+74.2%
XLF vs MDLZ
-2.9%
+77.1%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +1.9% | -3.4% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -1.2% | +0.4% | -1.6% | -1.2% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -0.6% | +9.8% | +9.1% |
| 6M | +16.3% | +14.7% | +1.6% | +14.0% |
| YTD | +5.4% | +18.0% | -12.5% | +2.3% |
| 1Y | +7.6% | +4.1% | +3.5% | +6.7% |
| 3Y | +74.2% | -4.6% | +78.8% | +70.1% |
| All | +74.2% | -2.9% | +77.1% | +70.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling