+74.2%
XLF vs INSM
+392.8%
-318.6%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | INSM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +1.7% | -1.0% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +2.5% | -3.9% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -2.2% | +1.0% | -1.1% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +33.8% | -24.6% | +8.6% |
| 6M | +16.3% | -7.2% | +23.5% | +16.3% |
| YTD | +5.4% | -25.6% | +31.1% | +5.7% |
| 1Y | +7.6% | -11.2% | +18.8% | +7.6% |
| 3Y | +74.2% | +388.3% | -314.1% | +74.5% |
| All | +74.2% | +392.8% | -318.6% | +74.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INSM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INSM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INSM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INSM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling