+75.2%
XLF vs GPC
-2.2%
+77.4%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GPC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.9% | +1.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -0.4% | -0.1% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +10.6% | +39.2% | -28.5% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +14.3% | +18.2% | -3.9% | +9.9% |
| YTD | +5.5% | +12.1% | -6.6% | +1.6% |
| 1Y | +9.6% | -0.7% | +10.2% | +8.6% |
| 3Y | +75.2% | -1.7% | +76.8% | +67.4% |
| All | +75.2% | -2.2% | +77.4% | +67.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GPC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GPC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GPC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GPC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling