+77.4%
XLF vs FN
+158.4%
-81.0%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +3.1% | -3.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -1.7% | +1.7% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +0.2% | -22.0% | +22.2% | +1.5% |
| 3M | +11.7% | -43.0% | +54.7% | +15.3% |
| 6M | +13.8% | -27.7% | +41.5% | +14.3% |
| YTD | +7.0% | -10.5% | +17.5% | +4.8% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | +12.5% | -3.4% | +3.8% |
| All | +77.4% | +158.4% | -81.0% | +44.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling