+73.0%
XLF vs EWT
+193.0%
-120.0%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EWT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.5% | +2.2% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -1.1% | -1.8% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -1.6% | +4.8% | -6.4% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +9.3% | +11.1% | -1.9% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +14.6% | +54.6% | -40.0% | +0.1% |
| YTD | +4.7% | +71.4% | -66.7% | -11.6% |
| 1Y | +8.6% | +82.1% | -73.5% | -10.2% |
| All | +73.0% | +193.0% | -120.0% | +12.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EWT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EWT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EWT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EWT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling