+53.9%
XLF vs BTSG
+389.4%
-335.6%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +1.5% | -0.8% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -3.3% | +1.8% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -1.6% | +0.4% | -1.1% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -6.9% | +16.1% | +9.4% |
| 6M | +16.3% | +42.1% | -25.8% | +9.2% |
| YTD | +5.4% | +56.8% | -51.4% | -2.7% |
| 1Y | +7.6% | +109.8% | -102.2% | -5.1% |
| All | +53.9% | +389.4% | -335.6% | +20.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling