+58.1%
XLE vs ACGL
+35.5%
+22.6%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -0.1% | -2.9% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -10.3% | +6.4% | -16.7% | -11.4% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +16.6% | -19.9% | -6.3% |
| 3M | +8.2% | +11.6% | -3.4% | +5.7% |
| 6M | +5.0% | +17.5% | -12.4% | +1.4% |
| YTD | +40.6% | +15.3% | +25.3% | +35.8% |
| 1Y | +45.0% | +26.3% | +18.7% | +36.8% |
| All | +58.1% | +35.5% | +22.6% | +53.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling