+73.1%
XLC vs ZETA
+288.0%
-214.9%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -4.1% | +2.9% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +2.7% | -3.5% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +1.0% | +15.8% | -14.8% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +35.4% | -36.1% | -4.2% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +67.1% | -72.3% | -10.8% |
| YTD | -4.3% | +54.1% | -58.3% | -9.7% |
| 1Y | -0.6% | +67.8% | -68.4% | -7.5% |
| All | +73.1% | +288.0% | -214.9% | +32.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling